Lewin noted that laissez-faire leadership tended to result in groups that lacked direction and members who blamed each other for mistakes, refused to accept personal responsibility, made less progress, and produced less work. First published in 1969, this model describes four primary styles of leadership, including: Later, Blanchard expanded upon the original Hersey and Blanchard model to emphasize how the developmental and skill level of learners influences the style that should be used by leaders. Participative leaders encourage group members to participate, but retain the final say in the decision-making process. Group members may also be motivated to perform well to receive rewards. Some of the most widely discussed include: authoritarian (autocratic), participative (democratic), delegative (laissez-faire), transformational, transactional, and situational. The pros of Democratic Leadership include: Creativity and innovation are encouraged, valuing the process of generating new ideas. Read on to learn more: Introduction to autocratic leadership style. Democratic coaching. They might stop thinking new & innovative ideas as the manager will always tell them what to do. One of the main reasons why teachers use the command method is that it helps keep the students under control. A 584226. After all, it introduces a new skill or movement pattern to the entire class while making sure everyone works at the same pace. In addition to learning and improving motor skills, giving consistent feedback to students also helps them understand what skills/movements they need to keep working on. Mosston himself called it a framework of options in the relationships between teacher and learner. While authoritarian leadership certainly is not the best choice for every situation, it can be effective and beneficial in cases where followers need a great deal of direction and where rules and standards must be followed to the letter. A coaching leadership style promotes a culture of high performance through empowerment of each member of the team, and collaboration of every member of the team to unlock and enable potential. Authoritarian leadership is best applied to situations where there is little time for group decision-making or where the leader is the most knowledgeable member of the group. For instance, in exchange for compliance and high performance, an employee might be rewarded with a promotion. If the leader leaves the company, then the rest of the team may not know how to complete their next assignment. command style coaching pros and cons Collaboration is highly emphasized, since the coach (leader) emphasizes teamwork within the team. The style is excellent for addressing people-related problems, whether caused by time-pressure, departmental, or cultural differences. It's not necessary to have a physical storefront or office space to get your business started. Although it has fallen out of favor in recent decades, the autocratic leadership style is still prevalent. Pros Stable in terms of job security and outcomes Removes favoritism from the equation Very clear roles, responsibilities, and expectations A highly visible set of processes and regulations Cons Not efficient since everything has to go through a chain of command Doesnt encourage an individuals personal or professional growth Magill, R. A. DNV Certificate: CERT-EIAMP-20151203-10006, member of the Dutch Coaching Association (NOBCO) nr: 5521, member of the International Coaching Federation nr. They might hesitate to take initiative as it might get overruled by the manager. Pros Bureaucratic coaching This type of leadership can be seen in a wide range of contexts, from businesses to schools to governments. bureaucratic), Can cause feelings of instability while disrupting the status quo, Lots of pressure on the leader, who needs to lead by example, Encourages two-way communication and collaboration, Facilitates the personal and professional development of individuals, Focuses on being supportive, not judgmental, Creates opportunities for growth and creative thinking, Resource intensive since it requires a lot of time and energy, Doesnt always lead to the fastest, most efficient results, May not be the ideal choice for high-pressure or strictly results-driven companies, Inclusive of a variety of opinions and ways of thinking, Leads to higher group engagement and productivity, The involvement of multiple people can lead to more communication gaps and confusion, Can take a longer time to come to a decision, An unskilled or untrained group can result in more decision making, Can lead to more creative, innovative ways of thinking, May lead to ambiguity in roles and responsibilities, Focuses on the development and growth of others, Can lead to improved performance, innovation, and collaboration, Creates a safe environment where people arent afraid to fail, Servant leaders can become more easily burnt out, Difficult to train other leaders in the serve-first mindset, Can take longer to see results or reach goals, Has the potential to be perceived as weak, Empowers individuals to practice their leadership skills, Can lead to increased creativity and innovation, Encourages trust between team members and leader, May lead to confusion about roles and responsibilities, Wont be effective with an unskilled or unmotivated team. Coaching leadership is a style defined by collaboration, support, and guidance. Bass BM. This makes it different to the command and control approach of the traditional management style, which is known to stifle potential.