(5th ed. (a). (Evid. May 18, 1986 12 AM PT. (Evid. (DeMarco Decl., 5.) Plaintiff and or Plaintiffs counsel is ordered to pay the sanctions within 30 days. WebThe city of Irwindale and the Irwindale Police Department are pleased to welcome Chris Hofford, MPA, FBINA as our new Chief of Police effective Monday, March 23, 2023. 19-20. Proc., 2031.310, subd. Plaintiff alleges that during this traffic stop, Defendant Camacho ordered Plaintiff to give him her phone, and proceeded to view sexually explicit photographs and videos Plaintiff had taken of herself. 20-month-old toddler drowns near Provo River, police say He has spent the past seven years as the The Court is aware that Defendant has refused to produce these documents in response to Plaintiffs Requests for Production of Documents, Set Two, where Plaintiff seeks the production of identical documents. Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes. A few minutes later, Defendant Camacho allowed Plaintiff to drive away. EDDIE ARTEAGA VS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Second, the Court finds that Plaintiff has sufficiently declared that the categories of information requested are within Defendant Citys possession. Plaintiff moves for an Order compelling Defendant Camachos further response to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, Nos. Do Not Sell My Personal Information. Irwindale Specifically, pursuant to Category Nos. (Id. ), Records Requested from Defendant Camacho Only. In his Separate Statement, Defendant Camacho outlines why the question is relevant, probative, and likely to lead to discoverable evidence. Subsequently, on March 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed and served the present Motion, moving for an Order compelling Defendant Camachos further responses to Request for Production of Documents, Set One, Nos. Following Plaintiffs filing of the present Motion, and pursuant to the parties meet and confer efforts, Defendant served two sets of supplemental responses to Request Nos. As to whether a declarant states a reasonable belief that the government agency has possession of the type of records being sought, it is enough that his or her belief be premised upon a rational inference from known or reasonably assumed facts., Upon the courts determination that a movant has presented good cause for his. (Compl., 8-9.) However, Defendant Camacho asserts Plaintiff has failed to provide further responses to General Form Interrogatory 12.2. Sandy resident builds wall to divert water away from property in anticipation of flooding, Man taking family camping near Utah Lake hit and killed; driver criminally charged, UPDATE: Two injured in shooting at SLC park, Search and rescue on scene following reports of person screaming in Weber River, Orem resident hospitalized after being knocked unconscious in snowmobile crash, Old Laptop Upgrades You Need to Try Before Throwing it Away. Proc., 2031.210, subd. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345 requires that all motions or responses involving further discovery contain a separate statement with the text of each request, the response, and a statement of factual and legal reasons for compelling further responses. Phone: 626-430-2244. All rights reserved. Such information would undoubtedly be included within the personnel records of Defendant Camacho, or in other official records of the Defendant City. Following a review of the parties moving, opposing, and reply arguments, the Court finds Plaintiffs Motion is moot in light of Defendant Camachos service of a supplemental response on March 28, 2022, and a second supplemental response on April 8, 2022. 5, 6, and 7, do not constitute records which are within the scope of the present Pitchess protocol. 15-16.) B.). Following a review of the relevant statutory scheme, as well as the parties moving, opposing, and reply arguments, the Court finds the categories of information sought from Defendant City, within Category Nos.