Six types of articles generate strong emotional responses. He explained that the description of narcissistic personality contains many of the elements of the antisocial personality, and that the antisocial personality is a subtype of narcissistic personality. We cannot say that the argument showed professional incompetence. Traisman noted that there was an unusual and significant disparity between defendant's verbal and nonverbal scores on the Wechsler test. When asked whether defendant's explanations of why he murdered the victims, e.g., because they asked for more money or threatened to reveal his homosexuality, were inconsistent with the theory of projection espoused by Dr. Freedman and Dr. Rappaport, Dr. Rappaport stated defendant may have "imposed those ideas on the individuals" or "tried to elicit behavior on their part to conform to his idea that they were bad people. El Observador Publications, Inc. 1042 West Hedding St. Suite #250, San Jose, CA. The assertion that the complaint contained insufficient facts to establish probable cause is without merit. The defense theory was that defendant was able to function well in society except when stress levels rose so high that he experienced something akin to a psychotic episode and that defendant was fit to stand trial was consistent with his defense. Second, pairing homosexuality with the term "mass murderer" had a strong emotional impact because it combined the number of deaths with the "topic of death." Trial counsel stipulated to the admission at the sentencing hearing of all the evidence presented at trial. 'John Wayne Gacy: Devil in Disguise': 11 Shocking Revelations - Yahoo Defendant's first two arguments concerning this contention assumed the invalidity of the first warrant. Later, at a side bar, the court asked Dr. Rappaport if he had attempted to contact the news media in any way. Other witnesses testified that defendant was boastful but not antisocial, that he was not a heavy drinker, and that he often had complained of physical ailments which did not appear to exist. 38, par. Here, however, the inference which the assistant State's Attorney was asking the jury to draw was that defendant's consultation with his attorneys prior to making statements to police concerning multiple personalities supported the experts' conclusions that defendant was attempting to fake an insanity defense. In People v. Peterson (1973), 15 Ill. App.3d 110, cited by defendant, the circuit court received information just before trial that one of the jurors had expressed her opinion that the defendant should plead guilty so that the jurors could go home. Our statute provides that a defendant may be sentenced to death if he "has been convicted of murdering two or more individuals * * * regardless of whether the deaths occurred as the result of the same act or of several related or unrelated acts so long as the deaths were the result of either an intent to kill more than one person or of separate premeditated acts * * *." Defendant next asserts that he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of committing indecent liberties and deviate sexual assault on Robert Piest as there was no corpus delicti for these offenses. Dr. Cavanaugh explained that the psychoanalytic approach was "highly deterministic" in that it is premised on the belief that certain types of behavior patterns, thoughts, feelings, or fantasies could be predicted by reconstruction of past experiences. Within less than a month, they spotted Gacys car, andtrailed him. He stated that, shortly before he was arrested, defendant came into the gas station and passed a bag with three rolled cigarettes to one of his employees. Antonucci managed to get out of one of the cuffs, but pretended that he had not, and when defendant returned to the room Antonucci placed the handcuffs on defendant. Defendant appeared very relaxed. In fact, one of the attorneys for the defendant stated on the record, outside the defendant's presence, that it was the defendant's request that he be sentenced immediately, without the benefit of a presentence investigation report. He diagnosed defendant as having an antisocial personality. In the course of the investigation defendant admitted that he had killed approximately 30 individuals, some buried in the crawl space under his home and five thrown into the Des Plaines River. The People and defendant stipulated that all the evidence heard at the trial could be considered by the jury at the death penalty hearing. jeffrey rignall testimony transcript - neerajshah.me The more articles and news reports disseminated in a particular location, the more likely that area's inhabitants would recall the event. Even if it could be shown that the jury was confused, we do not believe that that would constitute sufficient "good cause" to warrant a second jury. While there may be instances where such evidence is relevant, we fail to see its relevance here. Defendant was read his rights and had read and signed a waiver form given him by the Des Plaines police department. Get all your true crime news from Oxygen. Legally, Dr. Cavanaugh explained, a person could escape responsibility only when "an extreme situation arises" where the person's ability to form an intent is questioned. "Justice on Trial" will examine controversial topics often subject to . When O'Rourke's body was found in the Des Plaines River in Grundy County, it was naked and bloated. 38, par. Dr. Richard Ney, a psychologist, was called to interpret the data contained in the survey and the material gathered from the press and electronic media. Because defendant repeatedly passed out at school, he was told by Dr. John Cavanaugh that he should be sent to Cook County Hospital for psychiatric evaluation. On these facts, we must conclude that defendant waived his right to personally argue the motion for a new trial. On direct examination of Detective Michael Albrecht, the following colloquy occurred: Defense counsel immediately objected and asked for a side bar. Appellate counsel's suggestion that trial counsel's failure to pose an objection is indicative to incompetence of trial counsel is also without merit. He also remembered hearing airplanes during the attack, so he knew that the house was in close proximity to the airport. The judge to whom the complaint is submitted *22 must make a judgment whether probable cause existed, and the information furnished him "must provide the affiant's answer to the magistrate's hypothetical question, `What makes you think that the defendant committed the offense charged?'" Many witnesses indicated that the only reason defendant was involved in charitable or political work was in order to manipulate others or gain advantage for himself. Defendant next complains of three instances where counsel was allegedly improperly restricted in his examination of several experts. The People then detail the heinous nature of defendant's crimes both with the living victims and those who did not survive. The gun contained a blank.